The course of the U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in an international arbitration case is evident in Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s comment toward the end of Monday’s hearing:
‘Your – your whole argument gives me intellectual whiplash.’
I put that comment into context in my SCOTUSblog post today, which also describes other exchanges between various Justices and the 3 lawyers who argued the matter – for the Republic of Argentina, for a British private investor, and for amicus the United States of America.
The case that’s now under submission, BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina, arises out of a dispute covered by the 1990 bilateral investment treaty between Britain and Argentina. Today’s post on “the matryoshka-doll complexities” of the case builds on my November SCOTUSblog argument preview, on which I posted here. (photo credit)
One thought on “At Supreme Court, “intellectual whiplash” over investor-sovereign arbitration”